Recommendation

ChatGPT (GPT-4 API) vs. Llama 3 (Ollama)

ChatGPT (GPT-4 API) with a dedicated account for the game:

• Advantages:
  • ChatGPT offers the best text quality on the market. Complex dialogue, deep character development, and dynamic responses would be most impressive using this model.
  • Using a separate account specifically for the game ensures that no personal data or sensitive content is at risk.
  • The API integration is relatively simple and requires no additional hardware.
• Disadvantages:
  • Cost: The API incurs ongoing fees, which can grow quickly depending on the number of requests. This could be an issue for a student project.
  • Internet dependency: The game requires a stable internet connection, which could be a barrier for players who want to play offline.
• Assessment:
  • If we are willing to cover the API costs and the game is intended to be played online, ChatGPT is the most powerful option. A dedicated account minimizes any security or privacy concerns.

---

Llama 3 (Ollama):

• Advantages:
  • Offline capability: The model runs entirely locally, making it ideal for a point-and-click adventure that should be playable without internet access.
  • Efficiency: Llama 3 is optimized and requires fewer hardware resources than other models of similar quality.
  • Lower error rate: Compared to Llama 2, the error rate is reduced by over one-third, resulting in more reliable and immersive dialogue.
  • Cost-effective: No ongoing fees, making it ideal for a student project.
• Disadvantages:
  • Attribution requirement: We must visibly mention "Built with Meta Llama 3" in the game, which is a minor limitation.
  • Dependency on Ollama: Llama 3 is currently tied to the Ollama platform, meaning we depend on their updates and support.
• Assessment:
  • Llama 3 via Ollama is ideal if we want a powerful, offline-capable solution with no recurring costs. It's perfectly suited for our project.